<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google and SWFs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kennethsutherland.com/2009/04/27/google-and-swfs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kennethsutherland.com/2009/04/27/google-and-swfs/</link>
	<description>Flex with a hint of cool</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google, RSLs and indexing &#124; Blue Flex</title>
		<link>http://kennethsutherland.com/2009/04/27/google-and-swfs/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Google, RSLs and indexing &#124; Blue Flex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennethsutherland.com/?p=152#comment-128</guid>
		<description>[...] A while back I posted an article on Google giving errors with indexing SWF files that used the RSL framework feature to reduce the overall size of your SWF. It seemed to me very odd that you have Adobe trying to push the use of RSL&#8217;s as well as bumming up the great work that they&#8217;ve done with Google to index SWFs but not mentioning that fact that Google couldn&#8217;t index a SWF with an RSL. This lead people to see errors when they tried to find their app in a Google search.  See this for details http://kennethsutherland.com/2009/04/27/google-and-swfs/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A while back I posted an article on Google giving errors with indexing SWF files that used the RSL framework feature to reduce the overall size of your SWF. It seemed to me very odd that you have Adobe trying to push the use of RSL&#8217;s as well as bumming up the great work that they&#8217;ve done with Google to index SWFs but not mentioning that fact that Google couldn&#8217;t index a SWF with an RSL. This lead people to see errors when they tried to find their app in a Google search.  See this for details <a href="http://kennethsutherland.com/2009/04/27/google-and-swfs/" rel="nofollow">http://kennethsutherland.com/2009/04/27/google-and-swfs/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewBoldman</title>
		<link>http://kennethsutherland.com/2009/04/27/google-and-swfs/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewBoldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennethsutherland.com/?p=152#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Hi, good post. I have been woondering about this issue,so thanks for posting. I’ll definitely be coming back to your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, good post. I have been woondering about this issue,so thanks for posting. I’ll definitely be coming back to your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

